“The card reader is a computer and pw48 tendered it as exhibit 317 yet he was not the maker and could not explain it’s workability. The attitude of the court is clear on this, that once the maker of a document is kept away from cross examination on his document, such a document should be kept away as it lacks value.
The court of Appeal refered to 448,307 As The Number Of Accredited Voters and used that to declare that there was over voting. It Did Not Refer In Its Judgement Were It Got That Figure. No one knows the source.
It was the evidence of a pw49. The tribunal had rejected the evidence OF Pw49 and all the evidences tendered by him.while the evidences of pw 50, 51 and 52 (Umana’s witnesses)were rejected by the tribunal.
The court of appeal overlooked the decision of the lower court. PW 49 did not prove that 448,307 represented the total number of accredited voters in the state.
The court of appeal did a grave injustice to us by using a simple fraction of the total number of voters to nullify the result in the state.
My lord please correct this injustice and uphold the result as announced by INEC”
More details loading